Van der Sluis ,Van der Zee & Kalmijn Advocaten

Goed advies en duidelijk communicatie - Er werden geen te hoge verwachtingen voorgeschoteld. Duidelijke communicatie en tevreden over de afloop en het resultaat.

De heer Postma is een professionele en betrokken advocaat die helder communiceert, proactief handelt - Ik heb een zeer positieve ervaring gehad met de heer Postma. Zowel op persoonlijk als zakelijk vlak weet hij precies de juiste toon te raken. De communicatie is helder en to the point, zonder onnodige omwegen. Wat ik vooral waardeer, is de proactieve aanpak. Postma denkt vooruit, speelt kort op de bal en houdt je continu op de hoogte van de voortgang. Hierdoor weet je altijd waar je aan toe bent en kom je niet voor verrassingen te staan. Daarnaast is de uitleg altijd duidelijk, ook bij complexe juridische vraagstukken. Dit gaf mij veel vertrouwen in het proces en de beslissingen die genomen moesten worden. Kortom, een zeer professionele en betrokken advocaat die ik zeker kan aanbevelen!

Top advocaat - Is menseljjk begrijpt dat ieder mens niet aan bepaalde verwachtingen van het leven kan voldoen Staat je goed bij . Steld je goed op je gemak Weet goed in te haken bij de officier rechtbank.

They took my case to get back 2 months of salary from an ex employer who breached contract and labour laws. I am grateful they took my case. However, there was no attention to detail. I would have brought all my evidence to court if I had known how the proceeding goes. The judge asked for more evidence. The lawyer did not provide it, although I have sent him everything both on e-mail and on usb stick. I also asked the lawyer to meet with him to explain the numbers before the court date. He said that is not necessary. Mr. El Kadi came to court with the wrong numbers and also told the judge wrong numbers. Furthermore, he did not have evidence of correspondence with the defendant. The judge was very disappointed by that. I had very carefully sent all the necessary evidence and explained by email. Mr. El Kadi did not even bring it to court. On top of that, he did not even know how much salary was already paid, even though I offered to explain the numbers to him before, he did not think that was necessary. It comes across as arrogant. Especially when, in fact, he does not know in front of the judge. I had to go through my bank history on my bank app in the courtroom, wasting time of the judge. After the court procedure, he mailed me a new jaaropgaaf from the defendant. He said the case is now finished. In fact, he did not even check the jaaropgaaf. It was still missing about €400. When I mailed the lawyer, I asked to correct it. I saw Mr. El Kadi has left van der Sluis firm. His colleague replied: "that is not a job for a lawyer, that is a job for an accountant." So the lawyer could not take a few minutes to send one email for me. The defendant always avoided taxes and avoided paying at every opportunity. I got most of the money back from him, but I found it really not professional conduct from this law firm.